The problem among young women these days, apparently, is the damaging influence of the fashion and modelling businesses. Faced with page after page of doe-eyed streaks of bats’ urine in glossy magazines, they starve themselves into a coma so that they, too, can have the allure of a sexless teenage android.
From this, it’s a small step to an eating disorder and the waste of a young life. It’s a serious matter.
Now, I don’t want to seem fatuous or as if I’m trivialising all this, but I see another issue here, and this time it’s aesthetic. Because I’m quite modern and metrosexual these days, I realise that women don’t necessarily try to look the way they do for the benefit of men, but, even so, as a lesbian tragically born into a man’s body, I can’t help taking an interest in these things.
I’ve just never been very keen on really skinny women because they don’t look very friendly. Comfortable, even. They look like those chairs we had in school assembly and about as robust. I prefer women with what is sometimes termed ‘definition’; you know, the ones who look as if they’ve been inflated properly.
I wonder if things were better in the early Sixties, when a more fulsome type of model was fashionable. Maybe then there were complaints about women in their twenties bingeing on pies and fry-ups to increase their famine stores. What happy days they must’ve been.
Anyway – tyres. I’m not suggesting this is a directly related topic and yet, in a way, it is. A few days ago, I was looking at a slightly tricked-up Nissan sitting on tyres that had about as much give in them as a supermodel’s elbow, and I just didn’t fancy it at all. Didn’t look like it would keep you warm at night.
Then, in America a few weeks ago with Jeremy, we saw a Dodge Charger (the new one) on tyres that had obviously been up vomiting all night, and that looked really uninviting. I mean, the wheels looked positively unwell. Terrible, it was.
It’s been going on for years, this sort of thing, and I think it’s time we cried ‘enough’. Some tyres are now so thin it’s difficult to tell what they actually are. It’s fashion, obviously, because really low-profile tyres are of no benefit outside of the racetrack and only make the car steer and ride badly, so it will probably pass. I think this may be about to happen, and I do hope so.
I like a phat tyre as much as the next person, but I like to think in terms of the distance between the wheel rim and the tread, rather than the width. A car wearing a decent amount of rubber isn’t being swayed by fleeting trends. It’s a car that looks comfy, and forgiving. It looks like it will still make me a bacon sandwich when I’m old.
Let’s take the Rolls-Royce Phantom. Now there’s a car whose tyres haven’t seen too many salads, and rightly so. Back when this car was launched, a man from the factory spent a long time explaining to me why the relationship between the size of the wheel and the size of the tyre was not merely important for relaxing progress – which is what a Phantom is about, after all – but actually established in the eye of the viewer the essential attributes of a Roller.
I think he was right about this. I see a Phantom, I want to climb aboard. I see an AMG Mercedes on spray-ons, and I think I’d rather just go to the pub and maybe watch a war film later on.
It’s now happening in the world of motorcycling. Consider the Harley Davidson Sportster. It’s a bike that’s been around in one form or another for ages, but it’s never quite been my sort of thing. Now, though, I am overcome with a visceral urge to mount it. Why? Because I’ve discovered the Forty-Eight model, which simply has smaller wheels and bigger tyres, and it looks lovely as a result. American youths call this sort of thing ‘old skool’. I call it more than a handful, and that’s a result.
Thin is so mean, and so last-season. Fat is the future, and a decent depth of rubber is the way to get there. I know we supposedly have another problem with obesity, but what is that, exactly? Let’s not forget that society offers no privilege greater than the opportunity to get a bit tubby.
So let’s dish up some decent depth of sidewall and remind ourselves how lucky we are. Not with me yet? Look at this picture of the Harley Davidson Sportster Forty-Eight. Look at the boots on that baby. Wahey!

FIRST!!!!!
^^^ Who is this ‘First!!!!!’ Wally that thinks a ‘first’ comment on something nobody ever commented on, is like, “Yeah! I win!”. WT?.. James, the low profile tyres are not so much fashion, they reduce rubber tyre environmental impact. Modern suspensions absorb the bumps well. If the suspension feels hard, it is because it needs to maintain a low ground clearance whilst still absorbing road shock. the larger rims are to reduce side wall flex and improve handling. I drive modified 4WD in Queensland Australia and perhaps you should do the same if you want real rubber under your vehicle. Just don’t get a 4WD with ESC crud. The laws are too restrictive as per tyre selections and sizes because of it.
brilliantly said!
I agreed with the first rant so much I wasn’t sure if I was reading or just thinking it. Then came the parallel to tyres, and I thought about myself, when big wheels and low profiles were a “new” thing I was very much into it, but at some point in time, when some of us were not paying attention, it got silly, and has been taken to cartoonish proportions. It is a balance thing, a car with wheels that are too small looks wrong, as does a car with wheels that are amusingly large (with it’s painted on tyres). So yes, I too thing I will just wait this particular fashion trend out.
If it good enough for F1 to run 13″ tyres why the hell do we have over priced rubbish like 17″ and 18″
I see no reason to go below a 65 profile unless you are in a racing car.
Any lower sacrifices handling and comfort.
I have driven and sat in cars with elastic bands for tyres what a joke. Then again I am sixty years old and my boy racing days are over, well, apart from mad moments now and again.
SIXTH!!!!!
Does seem kinda weird that F1 cars run aspect ratios of 45 rear 55 front (or thereabouts) on 13′ rims. Australia’s V8 touring cars run 45′s on 17′s. Both would be considered very fat on a current performance road car.